Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23873577›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2014

Foraging activity is reduced in a mouse model of depression.

C R Yang, Z G Zhang, Y Y Bai, H Fiona Zhou, L Zhou, C S Ruan, F Li, C Q Li, H Y Zheng, L J Shen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Dysregulation of brain dopamine systems in major depressive disorder.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Astroglial correlates of neuropsychiatric disease: From astrocytopathy to astrogliosis.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. ProBDNF Signaling Regulates Depression-Like Behaviors in Rodents under Chronic Stress.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

C R YangYunnan Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cells, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Z G Zhang
Y Y Bai
H Fiona Zhou
L Zhou
C S Ruan
F Li
C Q Li
H Y Zheng
L J Shen
X F Zhou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression interferes with the human ability to make decisions. Multiple criteria have been adopted for the diagnosis of depression in humans, but no clear indicators are available in animal models to reflect the depressive mood, involving higher cognitive functions. The act of foraging is a species-specific behaviour which is believed to involve the decision-making and higher cognitive functions. We previously established a method to detect the foraging behaviour of rodents, in which our results demonstrated that NMDA and dopamine receptors were involved. Conversely, increased NMDA receptors and reduced dopamine have been reported in depression model rodents. However, we hypothesise that foraging activities may also be impaired in depression. To test the theory, we successfully established a mouse model of depression using the chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) paradigm. Most interestingly, the food foraging activity of mice after CUMS was significantly reduced. In addition, the treatment of anti-depressant fluoxetine reversed most depressive symptoms and reduced glial fibrillary associated protein (GFAP) expression in the hippocampus, but was less effective in the reduction of foraging activities. However, clozapine reversed all symptoms of CUMS-exposed mice including reduction of GFAP expression in the hippocampus and impaired foraging activity. Our findings of GFAP expression as a marker to validate the CUMS protocol provide further validation of our hypothesis, that the reduced food foraging is probably a new behavioural finding of depression in which the serotoninergic system could not be singly involved. Our study suggests that NMDA receptors, serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems are differentially involved in these food foraging behaviours. Our data suggest that the foraging test in rodents can be a useful tool to assess the ability of decision-making in depression.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBody WeightCerebral CortexChronic DiseaseClozapineDepressive DisorderDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFluoxetineFreezing Reaction, CatalepticGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHippocampusMaleAntidepressive AgentsClozapineFluoxetineGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.