ArticleProteins2014
Assessment of CASP10 contact-assisted predictions.
Article in Proteins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of environmental specificity in CASP results.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.Proteins · 2018Article
- Assessment of CASP11 contact-assisted predictions.Proteins · 2016Article
- Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL.Proteins · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessment of the utility of contact-based restraints in accelerating the prediction of protein structure using molecular dynamics simulations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Automated procedure for contact-map-based protein structure reconstruction.The Journal of membrane biology · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In CASP10, for the first time, contact-assisted structure predictions have been assessed. Sets of pairs of contacting residues from target structures were provided to predictors for a second round of prediction after the initial round in which they were given only sequences. The objective of the experiment was to measure model quality improvement resulting from the added contact information and thereby assess and help develop so-called hybrid prediction methods--methods where some experimentally determined distance constraints are used to augment de novo computational prediction methods. The results of the experiment were, overall, quite promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.