Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23873319›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2014

The effect of pH and fluoride concentration of liquid dentifrices on caries progression.

Cristiane de Almeida Baldini Cardoso, Dayane Franco Barros Mangueira, Kelly Polido Kaneshiro Olympio, Ana Carolina Magalhães, Daniela Rios, Heitor Marques Honório, Fabiano Vieira Vilhena, Fábio Correia Sampaio, Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiane de Almeida Baldini CardosoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, Bauru, São Paulo, 17012-901, Brazil.
Dayane Franco Barros Mangueira
Kelly Polido Kaneshiro Olympio
Ana Carolina Magalhães
Daniela Rios
Heitor Marques Honório
Fabiano Vieira Vilhena
Fábio Correia Sampaio
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis randomized clinical trial evaluated the effect of pH and fluoride concentration of liquid dentifrices (LD) on caries progression and fluoride uptake in the toenails of 2-4-year-old children. MATERIALS AND

methodsSchoolchildren living in a fluoridated area, with (A) or without (I) active caries lesions, were randomly allocated into three groups according to the LD they would use over 12 months: group 1 (n = 48-A/56-I): 550 μg fluoride (F)/g, pH 4.5; group 2 (n = 56-A/48-I) 1,100 μg F/g, pH 7.0; and group 3 (n = 52-A/55-I): 550 μg F/g, pH 7.0. The number of lesions becoming active/cavities or inactive was clinically evaluated by determining progression or regression. Additionally, white spot lesions were evaluated by the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method in 75 children. Toenail fluoride concentration was also evaluated. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and followed by Dunn's test or ANCOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

resultsCaries net increment followed a decreasing pattern according to the dentifrice used (G1 < G2 < G3), regardless caries activity, but significant differences were detected only for caries progression and net increment (G1 < G3) for the caries-active group when evaluated through visual inspection. For the regression, the values found for the three groups were more similar, without significant differences. QLF analysis detected no significant difference between groups 1 and 2, but they performed significantly better than group 3. A significantly lower toenail fluoride concentration was observed when children used the low-fluoride dentifrices.

conclusionThe low-fluoride acidic LD has good potential to prevent caries and reduce fluoride intake. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The low-F acidic dentifrice combines the desirable characteristics of caries prevention and reduced fluoride intake-for a product to be used by children, regardless their caries status.

Indexed as

DentifricesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationChild, PreschoolDental CariesDisease ProgressionFluoridesHumansDentifricesFluorides

Identifiers

PMID23873319
OpenAlexW2018013958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.