Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23873111›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013

Altered expression of ERs, aromatase, and COX2 connected to estrogen action in type 1 endometrial cancer biology.

Katarzyna Jarzabek, Mariusz Koda, Malgorzata Walentowicz-Sadlecka, Marek Grabiec, Piotr Laudanski, Slawomir Wolczynski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pilot Study of Daily Exemestane in Women with Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. COX-2-PGEArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna JarzabekDepartment of Biology and Pathology of Human Reproduction in Bialystok, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276, Bialystok, Poland, kasia.jarzabek@gmail.com.
Mariusz Koda
Malgorzata Walentowicz-Sadlecka
Marek Grabiec
Piotr Laudanski
Slawomir Wolczynski
Medical University of Białystok · PLCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to study estrogen-driven microenvironment associated with type 1 endometrial carcinoma, we evaluated estrogen receptors (ERs), aromatase, and cyclooxygenase II (COX2) molecular and immunohistochemical profiles with correlation to clinicopathological features. We investigated aromatase, ERα, ERβ, and COX2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels using quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemical method in 51 endometrial carcinomas and 16 normal endometria. All the studied tumors, as well as normal endometria, expressed ERα, ERβ, and COX2 mRNAs. Five endometrial carcinoma tissues and one normal endometrium showed no aromatase mRNA expression. The majority of tumors expressed ERα (82%), aromatase (80%), and COX2 (88%) proteins. Forty-one percent of the studied tumors were ERβ-negative. ERα and ERβ showed significantly decreased mRNA and protein expression levels in endometrial carcinoma as compared to normal endometrium. An opposite trend was shown for COX2 and aromatase proteins. ERα expression correlated positively with COX2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels (P < 0.005, r = 0.398; P < 0.0005, r = 0.510, respectively). There was also a positive correlation between COX2 and aromatase expression in cancer tissue (P < 0.002, r = 0.433 for transcriptional level; P < 0.0005, r = 0.614 for protein level). We observed positive correlations between ERβ and ERα, as well as between ERβ and COX2 at the transcriptional level only (P < 0.0005, r = 0.644; P < 0.002, r = 0.444, respectively). Negative correlations were found between pT category of primary tumor and levels of ERα and ERβ transcripts (P < 0.02, r = -0.332; P < 0.02, r = -0.348, respectively). A negative association between ERβ and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging was also found. The growth of EC1 with the presence of ERα and overexpression of aromatase and COX2 is dependent on estrogens. We believe that ERβ may be considered as a potential marker in the progression of disease in endometrial cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAromataseCyclooxygenase 2Endometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaEstrogensFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLinear ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingReceptors, EstrogenReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAromataseCyclooxygenase 2ESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaEstrogensPTGS2 protein, humanReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID23873111
PMCPMC3858613
OpenAlexW2060712587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.