Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23873003›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013

Somatostatin receptor PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumours: update on systematic review and meta-analysis.

Håkan Geijer, Lars H Breimer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Influence of lanreotide on uptake ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Estimation of split renal function on PET using the SSTR-targeting radioligands [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Investigation of Clinical, Laboratory, Imaging Findings and Histopathological Features of Patients wıth Gastric Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Håkan GeijerCentre for Assessment of Medical Technology in Örebro (CAMTÖ), Örebro University Hospital, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden, hakan.geijer@orebroll.se.
Lars H Breimer
Medical Center Hospital · USÖrebro University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuroendocrine tumours (NET) are uncommon and may be localized in many different places in the body. Traditional imaging has mainly been performed with CT and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). Recently, it has become possible to use somatostatin receptor PET/CT (SMSR PET) instead, which might improve diagnostic quality. To evaluate the diagnostic quality of SMSR PET we performed a meta-analysis as an update of a previous study published in 2012.

methodsA literature search was performed searching MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases with a combination of the expressions "PET", "positron emission tomography", "neuroendocrine" and "NET". The search was updated to 31 December 2012. Studies were selected which evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of SMSR PET for NET in the thorax or abdomen with a study size of at least eight patients. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated with QUADAS-2.

resultsEight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for final analysis, and 14 articles from a previous meta-analysis were added for a total of 22 articles. A total of 2,105 patients were included in the studies, an increase from 567 in the previous meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 93 % (95 % CI 91 - 94 %) and specificity 96 % (95 % CI 95 - 98 %). The area under the summary ROC curve was 0.98 (95 % CI 0.95 - 1.0). In the previous meta-analysis the pooled sensitivity was 93 % (95 % CI 91 - 95 %) and specificity 91 % (95 % CI 82 - 97 %).

conclusionSMSR PET has good diagnostic performance for evaluation of NET in the thorax and abdomen, better than SRS which has been the previous standard method. This meta-analysis gives further support for switching to SMSR PET.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPredictive Value of TestsReceptors, SomatostatinReceptors, Somatostatin

Identifiers

PMID23873003
OpenAlexW2089275510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.