Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23872814›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2013

Pediatric uveitis: new and future treatments.

Preema J Mehta, Janet L Alexander, H Nida Sen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Myopia and Other Visual Disorders in Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Update on Treatment of Pediatric Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) for pediatric uveitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2015
    Article
  13. Management of pediatric uveitis.F1000prime reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Preema J MehtaNational Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Janet L Alexander
H Nida Sen
Children's National · USNational Eye Institute · US

Funding

Uveitis and Ocular Immunology FellowshipZIEEY000482 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KODATI, SHILPA · 2009 to 2022
$4.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPediatric uveitis is relatively uncommon, accounting for only 5-10% of all patients with uveitis. However, owing to high prevalence of complications and devastating outcomes, its lifetime burden can be significant. RECENT

findingsImmunomodulatory therapy has been associated with better outcomes in noninfectious pediatric uveitis. However, effective treatments are limited by medication-related complications, including multiorgan toxicities and systemic side effects. SUMMARY: We review the current therapies available to treat pediatric uveitis, discuss novel and future therapies, and provide clinical recommendations utilizing these new agents. The consideration for treatment regimens in noninfectious pediatric uveitis is multifactorial. Understanding past, present, and future technology will aid in treatment of a complex and refractory disease.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantUveitisImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23872814
PMCPMC5569244
OpenAlexW1986682590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.