Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23872635›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2013

Independent specialization of the human and mouse X chromosomes for the male germ line.

Jacob L Mueller, Helen Skaletsky, Laura G Brown, Sara Zaghlul, Susan Rock, Tina Graves, Katherine Auger, Wesley C Warren, Richard K Wilson, David C Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Evolutionary and Expression Analysis of the Pig MAGE Gene Family.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jacob L MuellerWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Helen Skaletsky
Laura G Brown
Sara Zaghlul
Susan Rock
Tina Graves
Katherine Auger
Wesley C Warren
Richard K Wilson
David C Page

Funding

MAPPING THE HUMAN Y CHROMOSOMER01HG000257 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PAGE, DAVID C. · 1991 to 2013
$15.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the human and mouse X chromosomes to systematically test Ohno's law, which states that the gene content of X chromosomes is conserved across placental mammals. First, we improved the accuracy of the human X-chromosome reference sequence through single-haplotype sequencing of ampliconic regions. The new sequence closed gaps in the reference sequence, corrected previously misassembled regions and identified new palindromic amplicons. Our subsequent analysis led us to conclude that the evolution of human and mouse X chromosomes was bimodal. In accord with Ohno's law, 94-95% of X-linked single-copy genes are shared by humans and mice; most are expressed in both sexes. Notably, most X-ampliconic genes are exceptions to Ohno's law: only 31% of human and 22% of mouse X-ampliconic genes had orthologs in the other species. X-ampliconic genes are expressed predominantly in testicular germ cells, and many were independently acquired since divergence from the common ancestor of humans and mice, specializing portions of their X chromosomes for sperm production.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenes, X-LinkedGenomicsGerm CellsHumansMaleMammalsMiceMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNAX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID23872635
PMCPMC3758364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.