Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23872515›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2013

High concentrations of drug in target tissues following local controlled release are utilized for both drug distribution and biologic effect: an example with epicardial inotropic drug delivery.

Mikhail Y Maslov, Elazer R Edelman, Abraham E Wei, Matthew J Pezone, Mark A Lovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug deposition in coronary arteries with overlapping drug-eluting stents.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail Y MaslovTufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: mikhail.maslov@steward.org.
Elazer R Edelman
Abraham E Wei
Matthew J Pezone
Mark A Lovich
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USTufts University · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · US

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM49039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local drug delivery preferentially loads target tissues with a concentration gradient from the surface or point of release that tapers down to more distant sites. Drug that diffuses down this gradient must be in unbound form, but such drug can only elicit a biologic effect through receptor interactions. Drug excess loads tissues, increasing gradients and driving penetration, but with limited added biological response. We examined the hypothesis that local application reduces dramatically systemic circulating drug levels but leads to significantly higher tissue drug concentration than might be needed with systemic infusion in a rat model of local epicardial inotropic therapy. Epinephrine was infused systemically or released locally to the anterior wall of the heart using a novel polymeric platform that provides steady, sustained release over a range of precise doses. Epinephrine tissue concentration, upregulation of cAMP, and global left ventricular response were measured at equivalent doses and at doses equally effective in raising indices of contractility. The contractile stimulation by epinephrine was linked to drug tissue levels and commensurate cAMP upregulation for IV systemic infusion, but not with local epicardial delivery. Though cAMP was a powerful predictor of contractility with local application, tissue epinephrine levels were high and variable--only a small fraction of the deposited epinephrine was utilized in second messenger signaling and biologic effect. The remainder of deposited drug was likely used in diffusive transport and distribution. Systemic side effects were far more profound with IV infusion which, though it increased contractility, also induced tachycardia and loss of systemic vascular resistance, which were not seen with local application. Local epicardial inotropic delivery illustrates then a paradigm of how target tissues differentially handle and utilize drug compared to systemic infusion.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAlginatesAnimalsCalciumCardiotonic AgentsCyclic AMPDelayed-Action PreparationsEpinephrineGlucuronic AcidHeart VentriclesHexuronic AcidsHydrogelsInfusions, IntravenousMaleMyocardial ContractionPericardiumAlginatesCalciumCardiotonic AgentsCyclic AMPDelayed-Action PreparationsEpinephrineGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogelscAMPContractilityECEpicardialEpicardial drug deliveryHeart rateHRInotropeIntravenousIVLeft ventricular anterior wallLeft ventricular inferior wallLVAWLVIWMax dP/dtMaximum rate of change of pressureSVRSystemic vascular resistance

Identifiers

PMID23872515
PMCPMC4646071
OpenAlexW2019604222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.