Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23872236›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2013

Postembryonic lineages of the Drosophila brain: II. Identification of lineage projection patterns based on MARCM clones.

Darren C Wong, Jennifer K Lovick, Kathy T Ngo, Wichanee Borisuthirattana, Jaison J Omoto, Volker Hartenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lineages to circuits: the developmental and evolutionary architecture of information channels into the central complex.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darren C WongDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive, 5009 Terasaki Life Sciences Bldg, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Jennifer K Lovick
Kathy T Ngo
Wichanee Borisuthirattana
Jaison J Omoto
Volker Hartenstein
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA NIGMS T32 Program AssessmentT32GM007185 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TORRES, JORGE · 1985 to 2020
$21.7M
Lineage-associated wiring properties of Drosphila brain neuronsR01NS054814 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HARTENSTEIN, VOLKER, LOUIS, MATTHIEU R. P. J. C. G. · 2006 to 2025
$6.6M
DNA Adduct-Induced MutagenesisR01ES029357 · NIEHS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STONE, MICHAEL P · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029357NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007185NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054814NINDS NIH HHS R01NS054814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila central brain is largely composed of lineages, units of sibling neurons derived from a single progenitor cell or neuroblast. During the early embryonic period, neuroblasts generate the primary neurons that constitute the larval brain. Neuroblasts reactivate in the larva, adding to their lineages a large number of secondary neurons which, according to previous studies in which selected lineages were labeled by stably expressed markers, differentiate during metamorphosis, sending terminal axonal and dendritic branches into defined volumes of the brain neuropil. We call the overall projection pattern of neurons forming a given lineage the "projection envelope" of that lineage. By inducing MARCM clones at the early larval stage, we labeled the secondary progeny of each neuroblast. For the supraesophageal ganglion excluding mushroom body (the part of the brain investigated in the present work) we obtained 81 different types of clones. Based on the trajectory of their secondary axon tracts (described in the accompanying paper, Lovick et al., 2013), we assigned these clones to specific lineages defined in the larva. Since a labeled clone reveals all aspects (cell bodies, axon tracts, terminal arborization) of a lineage, we were able to describe projection envelopes for all secondary lineages of the supraesophageal ganglion. This work provides a framework by which the secondary neurons (forming the vast majority of adult brain neurons) can be assigned to genetically and developmentally defined groups. It also represents a step towards the goal to establish, for each lineage, the link between its mature anatomical and functional phenotype, and the genetic make-up of the neuroblast it descends from.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell LineageDrosophilaMicroscopy, ConfocalBrainDevelopmentDrosophilaLineageMappingSAT

Identifiers

PMID23872236
PMCPMC3928077
OpenAlexW2005463278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.