Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23872012›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2013

Chitosans for delivery of nucleic acids.

Michael D Buschmann, Abderrazzak Merzouki, Marc Lavertu, Marc Thibault, Myriam Jean, Vincent Darras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emerging Perspectives on Prime Editor Delivery to the Brain.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Formulation of Chitosan-Zein Nano-in-Microparticles for Oral DNA Delivery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chitosan Based MicroRNA Nanocarriers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael D BuschmannDept. Chemical Engineering and Inst. Biomedical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: michael.buschmann@polymtl.ca.
Abderrazzak Merzouki
Marc Lavertu
Marc Thibault
Myriam Jean
Vincent Darras

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternatives to efficient viral vectors in gene therapy are desired because of their poor safety profiles. Chitosan is a promising non-viral nucleotide delivery vector because of its biocompatibility, biodegradability, low immunogenicity and ease of manufacturing. Since the transfection efficiency of chitosan polyplexes is relatively low compared to viral counterparts, there is an impetus to gain a better understanding of the structure-performance relationship. Recent progress in preparation and characterisation has enabled coupling analysis of chitosans structural parameters that has led to increased TE by tailoring of chitosan's structure. In this review, we summarize the recent advances that have lead to a more rational design of chitosan polyplexes. We present an integrated review of all major areas of chitosan-based transfection, including preparation, chitosan and polyplexes physicochemical characterisation, in vitro and in vivo assessment. In each, we present the obstacles to efficient transfection and the strategies adopted over time to surmount these impediments.

Indexed as

AnimalsChitosanGenetic TherapyHumansNucleic AcidsPolynucleotidesTransfectionChitosanNucleic AcidsPolynucleotidesChitosansGene deliveryNanotechnologyNucleic acidPolysaccharideRNAi

Identifiers

PMID23872012
PMCPMC7103275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.