Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23871492›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2013

A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II.

Fiona E Matthews, Antony Arthur, Linda E Barnes, John Bond, Carol Jagger, Louise Robinson, Carol Brayne, Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Collaboration

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03683394 (Multidomain Alzheimers Risk Reduction Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 421 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
421citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
72.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03683394 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Multidomain Alzheimers Risk Reduction Study (MARRS) Pilot

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2018 to 2022Enrolled172ConditionsDementia, Alzheimer DiseaseArmsSMARRT Intervention, Health Education Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

421 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Non-Genetic Risk Factors of Alzheimer's Disease: An Updated Umbrella Review.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a community setting.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  11. Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the detection of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. AD-8 for detection of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  17. Guideline
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

361 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona E MatthewsMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Antony Arthur
Linda E Barnes
John Bond
Carol Jagger
Louise Robinson
Carol Brayne
Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Collaboration
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-043Medical Research Council G0601022Medical Research Council G9901400Medical Research Council MC_U105292687Medical Research Council U105292687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of dementia is of interest worldwide. Contemporary estimates are needed to plan for future care provision, but much evidence is decades old. We aimed to investigate whether the prevalence of dementia had changed in the past two decades by repeating the same approach and diagnostic methods as used in the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS) in three of the original study areas in England.

methodsBetween 1989 and 1994, MRC CFAS investigators did baseline interviews in populations aged 65 years and older in six geographically defined areas in England and Wales. A two stage process, with screening followed by diagnostic assessment, was used to obtain data for algorithmic diagnoses (geriatric mental state-automated geriatric examination for computer assisted taxonomy), which were then used to estimate dementia prevalence. Data from three of these areas--Cambridgeshire, Newcastle, and Nottingham--were selected for CFAS I. Between 2008 and 2011, new fieldwork was done in the same three areas for the CFAS II study. For both CFAS I and II, each area needed to include 2500 individuals aged 65 years and older to provide power for geographical and generational comparison. Sampling was stratified according to age group (65-74 years vs ≥75 years). CFAS II used identical sampling, approach, and diagnostic methods to CFAS I, except that screening and assessement were combined into one stage. Prevalence estimates were calculated using inverse probability weighting methods to adjust for sampling design and non-response. Full likelihood Bayesian models were used to investigate informative non-response.

findings7635 people aged 65 years or older were interviewed in CFAS I (9602 approached, 80% response) in Cambridgeshire, Newcastle, and Nottingham, with 1457 being diagnostically assessed. In the same geographical areas, the CFAS II investigators interviewed 7796 individuals (14,242 approached, 242 with limited frailty information, 56% response). Using CFAS I age and sex specific estimates of prevalence in individuals aged 65 years or older, standardised to the 2011 population, 8·3% (884,000) of this population would be expected to have dementia in 2011. However, CFAS II shows that the prevalence is lower (6·5%; 670,000), a decrease of 1·8% (odds ratio for CFAS II vs CFAS I 0·7, 95% CI 0·6-0·9, p=0·003). Sensitivity analyses suggest that these estimates are robust to the change in response.

interpretationThis study provides further evidence that a cohort effect exists in dementia prevalence. Later-born populations have a lower risk of prevalent dementia than those born earlier in the past century.

fundingUK Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionCohort EffectCohort StudiesDementiaEnglandFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceResidence CharacteristicsSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID23871492
PMCPMC3906607
OpenAlexW2102315975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.