Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013
Protocol for the evaluation of a pay for performance programme in Pwani region in Tanzania: a controlled before and after study.
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring and understanding the effects of a performance based financing scheme applied to nutrition services in Burundi-a mixed method impact evaluation design.International journal for equity in health · 2016Trial
- Protocol for the process evaluation of interventions combining performance-based financing with health equity in Burkina Faso.Implementation science : IS · 2014Trial
- Does dosage matter? Effects of results-based financing layered on top of less comprehensive direct facility financing in Tanzania.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying the active ingredients in payment for performance programmes using system dynamics modelling.SSM - health systems · 2025Article
- Supply-side factors influencing demand for facility-based delivery in Tanzania: a multilevel analysis.Health economics review · 2023Article
- An equity analysis on the household costs of accessing and utilising maternal and child health care services in Tanzania.Health economics review · 2022Article
- Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Long-term effects of payment for performance on maternal and child health outcomes: evidence from Tanzania.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Understanding the maternal and child health system response to payment for performance in Tanzania using a causal loop diagram approach.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Direct Health Facility Financing Program in Improving Maternal Health Services in Pangani District, Tanzania.International journal of women's health · 2021Article
- Evaluating the impact of results-based motivating system on noncommunicable diseases risk factors in Iran: Study protocol for a field trial.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Experiences of care in the context of payment for performance (P4P) in Tanzania.Globalization and health · 2019Article
- Does payment for performance increase performance inequalities across health providers? A case study of Tanzania.Health policy and planning · 2018Article
- Validity of parental recalls to estimate vaccination coverage: evidence from Tanzania.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania.International journal for equity in health · 2018Article
- Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Understanding causal pathways within health systems policy evaluation through mediation analysis: an application to payment for performance (P4P) in Tanzania.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of the diarrhea alleviation through zinc and oral rehydration therapy (DAZT) program in rural Gujarat India: an application of the net-benefit regression framework.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of supply-side incentives to increase health service utilisation and enhance service quality is gaining momentum in many low- and middle-income countries. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the impact of such schemes, their cost-effectiveness, and the process of implementation and potential unintended consequences in these settings. A pay for performance (P4P) programme was introduced in Pwani region of Tanzania in 2011. METHODS/
designAn evaluation of the programme will be carried out to inform a potential national rollout. A controlled before and after study will examine the effect of the P4P programme on quality, coverage, and cost of targeted maternal and newborn healthcare services and selected non-targeted services at facilities in Tanzania. Data will be collected from a survey of 75 facilities, 750 patients exiting consultations, over 75 health workers, and 1,500 households of women who delivered in the previous year, in all seven intervention districts. Data will be collected from the same number of respondents in four control districts. A process evaluation will examine: whether the P4P programme was implemented as planned; stakeholder response to the programme and its acceptability; and implementation bottlenecks and facilitating factors. Three rounds of process data collection will be conducted including a review of available P4P documents, individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants working at facility and district level in five of the intervention districts, and at the regional and national levels. An economic evaluation will measure the cost-effectiveness of P4P relative to current practice from a societal perspective. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will contribute robust evidence on the impact and cost-effectiveness of P4P in a low income setting, as well as generate a better understanding of the feasibility of integrating complex intervention packages like P4P within health systems in resource poor settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.