Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870664›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2013

Dancing the cell cycle two-step: regulation of yeast G1-cell-cycle genes by chromatin structure.

David J Stillman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nucleosomes inhibit target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Disruption of promoter memory by synthesis of a long noncoding RNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J StillmanDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. david.stillman@path.utah.edu
University of Utah · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATIONR01GM039067 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI STILLMAN, DAVID J · 1988 to 2013
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM039067NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chromatin structure at a promoter can define how a gene is regulated. Studies of two yeast genes expressed in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, HO and CLN2, have provided important paradigms for transcriptional regulation. Although the SBF (Swi4/Swi6 box factor) transcription factor activates both genes, the chromatin landscapes that regulate SBF binding are different. Specifically, the CLN2 promoter is constitutively available for SBF binding, whereas HO has a complex two-step promoter in which chromatin changes in one region allow SBF to bind at a downstream location. These studies reveal the role of chromatin in defining the regulatory properties of promoters.

Indexed as

Cell CycleFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalPromoter Regions, GeneticYeastsFungal Proteinscell cyclechromatingene activationpromoter

Identifiers

PMID23870664
PMCPMC3771362
OpenAlexW2050069707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.