Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870501›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jette Led Sørensen, Cees Van der Vleuten, Jane Lindschou, Christian Gluud, Doris Østergaard, Vicki LeBlanc, Marianne Johansen, Kim Ekelund, Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen, Berit Woetman Pedersen and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01792674 (A Randomised Educational Feasibility Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01792674 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Educational Feasibility Trial: 'In Situ Simulation' Versus 'Off Site Simulation' in Obstetric Emergencies and the Effect on Knowledge, Safety-attitudes, Team Performance, Stress, and Motivation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2013 to 2013Enrolled97ConditionsEducation, Obstetrics, Simulation, 'In Situ Simulation'ArmsIn situ simulation, Off site simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Applications of Virtual Reality Technology in Medical Groups Teaching.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2018
    Article
  16. Challenges in the use of intraosseous access.The Indian journal of medical research · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jette Led SørensenDepartment of Obstetrics, Department of Anaesthesia and Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark. jette.led.soerensen@regionh.dk
Cees Van der Vleuten
Jane Lindschou
Christian Gluud
Doris Østergaard
Vicki LeBlanc
Marianne Johansen
Kim Ekelund
Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen
Berit Woetman Pedersen
Hanne Kjærgaard
Pia Weikop
Bent Ottesen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnexpected obstetric emergencies threaten the safety of pregnant women. As emergencies are rare, they are difficult to learn. Therefore, simulation-based medical education (SBME) seems relevant. In non-systematic reviews on SBME, medical simulation has been suggested to be associated with improved learner outcomes. However, many questions on how SBME can be optimized remain unanswered. One unresolved issue is how 'in situ simulation' (ISS) versus 'off site simulation' (OSS) impact learning. ISS means simulation-based training in the actual patient care unit (in other words, the labor room and operating room). OSS means training in facilities away from the actual patient care unit, either at a simulation centre or in hospital rooms that have been set up for this purpose. METHODS AND

designThe objective of this randomized trial is to study the effect of ISS versus OSS on individual learning outcome, safety attitude, motivation, stress, and team performance amongst multi-professional obstetric-anesthesia teams.The trial is a single-centre randomized superiority trial including 100 participants. The inclusion criteria were health-care professionals employed at the department of obstetrics or anesthesia at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, who were working on shifts and gave written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were managers with staff responsibilities, and staff who were actively taking part in preparation of the trial. The same obstetric multi-professional training was conducted in the two simulation settings. The experimental group was exposed to training in the ISS setting, and the control group in the OSS setting. The primary outcome is the individual score on a knowledge test. Exploratory outcomes are individual scores on a safety attitudes questionnaire, a stress inventory, salivary cortisol levels, an intrinsic motivation inventory, results from a questionnaire evaluating perceptions of the simulation and suggested changes needed in the organization, a team-based score on video-assessed team performance and on selected clinical performance. DISCUSSION: The perspective is to provide new knowledge on contextual effects of different simulation settings.

trial registrationClincialTrials.gov NCT01792674.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelComputer SimulationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeManikinsMotivationPatient Care TeamPatient SimulationResearch DesignWorkplaceClinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorDenmarkEducation, Medical, ContinuingEmergenciesFemaleGroup Processes

Identifiers

PMID23870501
PMCPMC3716971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.