Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870287›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2013

Reticulocyte dynamic and hemoglobin variability in hemodialysis patients treated with Darbepoetin alfa and C.E.R.A.: a randomized controlled trial.

Valentina Forni, Giorgia Bianchi, Adam Ogna, Igor Salvadé, Philippe Vuistiner, Michel Burnier, Luca Gabutti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01666301 (Reticulocyte Dynamic and Related Hemoglobin Variability in Hemodialysis Patients Treated With Darbepoetin Alfa and C.E.R.A.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01666301 nacompletednot on this map

Reticulocyte Dynamic and Related Hemoglobin Variability in Hemodialysis Patients Treated With Darbepoetin Alfa and C.E.R.A.: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOspedale Regionale di LocarnoRan2010 to 2012Enrolled31ConditionsErythropoiesis Stimulating Agent PharmacodynamicsArmscomparison between darbepoetin alfa and C.E.R.A. and different administration intervals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Darbepoetin for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentina Forni
Giorgia Bianchi
Adam Ogna
Igor Salvadé
Philippe Vuistiner
Michel Burnier
Luca Gabutti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a simulation based on a pharmacokinetic model we demonstrated that increasing the erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) half-life or shortening their administration interval decreases hemoglobin variability. The benefit of reducing the administration interval was however lessened by the variability induced by more frequent dosage adjustments. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reticulocyte and hemoglobin kinetics and variability under different ESAs and administration intervals in a collective of chronic hemodialysis patients.

methodsThe study was designed as an open-label, randomized, four-period cross-over investigation, including 30 patients under chronic hemodialysis at the regional hospital of Locarno (Switzerland) in February 2010 and lasting 2 years. Four subcutaneous treatment strategies (C.E.R.A. every 4 weeks Q4W and every 2 weeks Q2W, Darbepoetin alfa Q4W and Q2W) were compared with each other. The mean square successive difference of hemoglobin, reticulocyte count and ESAs dose was used to quantify variability. We distinguished a short- and a long-term variability based respectively on the weekly and monthly successive difference.

resultsNo difference was found in the mean values of biological parameters (hemoglobin, reticulocytes, and ferritin) between the 4 strategies. ESAs type did not affect hemoglobin and reticulocyte variability, but C.E.R.A induced a more sustained reticulocytes response over time and increased the risk of hemoglobin overshooting (OR 2.7, p = 0.01). Shortening the administration interval lessened the amplitude of reticulocyte count fluctuations but resulted in more frequent ESAs dose adjustments and in amplified reticulocyte and hemoglobin variability. Q2W administration interval was however more favorable in terms of ESAs dose, allowing a 38% C.E.R.A. dose reduction, and no increase of Darbepoetin alfa.

conclusionsThe reticulocyte dynamic was a more sensitive marker of time instability of the hemoglobin response under ESAs therapy. The ESAs administration interval had a greater impact on hemoglobin variability than the ESAs type. The more protracted reticulocyte response induced by C.E.R.A. could explain both, the observed higher risk of overshoot and the significant increase in efficacy when shortening its administration interval.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01666301.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesDarbepoetin alfaDrug Administration ScheduleErythropoietinFemaleHematinicsHemoglobinsHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsReticulocyte Countcontinuous erythropoietin receptor activatorDarbepoetin alfaErythropoietinHematinicsHemoglobinsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID23870287
PMCPMC3733800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.