ArticleBiophysical journal2013
Disruption of intrinsic motions as a mechanism for enzyme inhibition.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridium difficile (C. diff) is one of the most common and most severe hospital-acquired infections; its consequences range from lengthened hospital stay to outright lethality. C. diff causes cellular damage through the action of two large toxins TcdA and TcdB. Recently, there has been increased effort toward developing antitoxin therapies, rather than antibacterial treatments, in hopes of mitigating the acquisition of drug resistance. To date, no analysis of the recognition mechanism of TcdA or TcdB has been attempted. Here, we use small molecule flexible docking followed by unbiased molecular dynamics to obtain a more detailed perspective on how inhibitory peptides, exemplified by two species HQSPWHH and EGWHAHT function. Using principal component analysis and generalized masked Delaunay analysis, an examination of the conformational space of TcdB in its apo form as well as forms bound to the peptides and UDP-Glucose was performed. Although both species inhibit by binding in the active site, they do so in two very different ways. The simulations show that the conformational space occupied by TcdB bound to the two peptides are quite different and provide valuable insight for the future design of toxin inhibitors and other enzymes that interact with their substrates through conformational capture mechanisms and thus work by the disruption of the protein's intrinsic motions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.