Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870166›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2014

Incidence of pertussis in patients of general practitioners in Poland.

P Stefanoff, I A Paradowska-Stankiewicz, M Lipke, E Karasek, W Rastawicki, A Zasada, S Samuels, H Czajka, R G Pebody

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assessment of Pertussis Underreporting in Italy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of Bordetella pertussis clinical isolates circulating in European countries during the period 1998-2012.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  7. Incidence and factors predicting whooping cough due to parapertussis diagnosis among patients referred to general practitioners, Poland, 2009-2011.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

P StefanoffNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
I A Paradowska-StankiewiczNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
M LipkeNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
E KarasekNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
W RastawickiNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
A ZasadaNational Institute of Public Health - National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland.
S SamuelsState University of New York at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
H CzajkaProvincial Children's Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
R G PebodyRespiratory Diseases Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England, Colindale, UK.
Public Health England · GBUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USUniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the incidence of pertussis in patients consulting general practitioners (GPs). Between July 2009 and April 2011, we conducted a prospective cohort study of patients attending 78 general practices (158 863 persons overall). We included patients aged ≥ 3 years, with cough lasting 2-15 weeks, who gave informed consent. GPs interviewed eligible patients, collected a blood specimen, and a nasopharyngeal swab. At follow-up 30-60 days after the initial visit, physicians collected a second blood specimen and conducted patient interview. Cases were confirmed by specific IgA and/or IgG antibody titre exceeding significantly the general population background level or detection of bacterial DNA by real-time PCR. During the study period, 3864 patients with prolonged cough consulted the participating GPs, of those 1852 met the inclusion criteria, 1232 were recruited, and 288 were confirmed as pertussis cases (4% by PCR, 96% by serology). The adjusted incidence rate was 201.1/100 000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 133.9-302.0], ranging from 456.5 (95% CI 239.3-870.8) in the 15-19 years group to 94.0 (95% CI 33.4-264.5) in the 25-29 years group. The reporting ratio was 61, ranging from 4 in those aged 3-5 years, to 167 in those aged 65-69 years. The study confirmed high incidence of pertussis in all age groups in the general population, in particular in adults, not appropriately documented by the existing surveillance system.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialChildChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPolandProspective StudiesPublic Health SurveillanceAntibodies, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23870166
PMCPMC9151120
OpenAlexW2002301210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.