Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870124›Full record

ArticleCell2013

A network of cadherin-mediated interactions polarizes growth cones to determine targeting specificity.

Tina Schwabe, Helen Neuert, Thomas R Clandinin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nervous system-wide analysis of allScience advances · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Synaptic promiscuity in brain development.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural specification, targeting, and circuit formation during visual system assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Establishment and Maintenance of Neural Circuit Architecture.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina SchwabeDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Helen Neuert
Thomas R Clandinin

Funding

How do photoreceptor axons choose appropriate post-synaptic partners?R01EY015231 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2004 to 2010
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal growth cones select synaptic partners through interactions with multiple cell surfaces in their environment. Many of these interactions are adhesive, yet it is unclear how growth cones integrate adhesive cues to direct their movements. Here, we examine the mechanisms that enable photoreceptors in the Drosophila visual system to choose synaptic partners. We demonstrate that the classical cadherin, N-cadherin, and an atypical cadherin, Flamingo, act redundantly to instruct the targeting choices made by every photoreceptor axon. These molecules gradually bias the spatial distribution of growth cone filopodia, polarizing each growth cone toward its future synaptic target before direct contact with the target occurs. We demonstrate that these molecules are localized to distinct subcellular domains and create a network of adhesive interactions distributed across many growth cones. Because this network comprises multiple redundant interactions, a complex wiring diagram can be constructed with extraordinary fidelity, suggesting a general principle.

Indexed as

Growth ConesSynapsesAnimalsAxonsCadherinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateRetinaCadherinsCadN protein, DrosophilaDrosophila Proteinsstan protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID23870124
PMCPMC4023681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.