Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23870106›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2014

Orthogonal analytical methods for botanical standardization: determination of green tea catechins by qNMR and LC-MS/MS.

José G Napolitano, Tanja Gödecke, David C Lankin, Birgit U Jaki, James B McAlpine, Shao-Nong Chen, Guido F Pauli

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantum-Mechanical DrivenACS omega · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Proanthocyanidin Dimers and Trimers fromJournal of natural products · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of tea polyphenols on proliferation and apoptosis of cadmium-transformed cells.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José G NapolitanoDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
Tanja GödeckeDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
David C LankinDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
Birgit U JakiDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
James B McAlpineDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
Shao-Nong ChenDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America.
Guido F PauliDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America. Electronic address: gfp@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

900MHz NMR for Structural Biology in ChicagoP41GM068944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GETTINS, PETER G.W. · 2003 to 2007
$6.2M
Spectrometric Validation of Botanical Materials and Reference StandardsRC2AT005899 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAULI, GUIDO F · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS RC2 AT005899NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM068944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of analytical methods for parallel characterization of multiple phytoconstituents is essential to advance the quality control of herbal products. While chemical standardization is commonly carried out by targeted analysis using gas or liquid chromatography-based methods, more universal approaches based on quantitative (1)H NMR (qHNMR) measurements are being used increasingly in the multi-targeted assessment of these complex mixtures. The present study describes the development of a 1D qHNMR-based method for simultaneous identification and quantification of green tea constituents. This approach utilizes computer-assisted (1)H iterative Full Spin Analysis (HiFSA) and enables rapid profiling of seven catechins in commercial green tea extracts. The qHNMR results were cross-validated against quantitative profiles obtained with an orthogonal LC-MS/MS method. The relative strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are discussed, with special emphasis on the role of identical reference standards in qualitative and quantitative analyses.

Indexed as

CatechinChromatography, LiquidNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularQuality ControlReference StandardsTandem Mass SpectrometryTeaCatechinTea(1)H NMR fingerprintsGreen tea catechinsHiFSALC–MS/MSqHNMRqNMR

Identifiers

PMID23870106
PMCPMC3875626
OpenAlexW2019282046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.