Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23869286›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2013

The history of pathology informatics: A global perspective.

Seung Park, Anil V Parwani, Raymond D Aller, Lech Banach, Michael J Becich, Stephan Borkenfeld, Alexis B Carter, Bruce A Friedman, Marcial Garcia Rojo, Andrew Georgiou and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TelePi: an affordable telepathology microscope camera system anyone can build and use.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  9. Computer-aided scoring ofJournal of pathology informatics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Automated histological classification of whole-slide images of gastric biopsy specimens.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Computational Pathology: A Path Ahead.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Seung ParkDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anil V Parwani
Raymond D Aller
Lech Banach
Michael J Becich
Stephan Borkenfeld
Alexis B Carter
Bruce A Friedman
Marcial Garcia Rojo
Andrew Georgiou
Gian Kayser
Klaus Kayser
Michael Legg
Christopher Naugler
Takashi Sawai
Hal Weiner
Dennis Winsten
Liron Pantanowitz

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathology informatics has evolved to varying levels around the world. The history of pathology informatics in different countries is a tale with many dimensions. At first glance, it is the familiar story of individuals solving problems that arise in their clinical practice to enhance efficiency, better manage (e.g., digitize) laboratory information, as well as exploit emerging information technologies. Under the surface, however, lie powerful resource, regulatory, and societal forces that helped shape our discipline into what it is today. In this monograph, for the first time in the history of our discipline, we collectively perform a global review of the field of pathology informatics. In doing so, we illustrate how general far-reaching trends such as the advent of computers, the Internet and digital imaging have affected pathology informatics in the world at large. Major drivers in the field included the need for pathologists to comply with national standards for health information technology and telepathology applications to meet the scarcity of pathology services and trained people in certain countries. Following trials by a multitude of investigators, not all of them successful, it is apparent that innovation alone did not assure the success of many informatics tools and solutions. Common, ongoing barriers to the widespread adoption of informatics devices include poor information technology infrastructure in undeveloped areas, the cost of technology, and regulatory issues. This review offers a deeper understanding of how pathology informatics historically developed and provides insights into what the promising future might hold.

Indexed as

clinical informaticselectronic medical recordHistorylaboratory information systemspathology educationpathology informatics

Identifiers

PMID23869286
PMCPMC3714902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.