Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23868909›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2014

Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout: integrating systematic literature review and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e initiative.

Francisca Sivera, Mariano Andrés, Loreto Carmona, Alison S R Kydd, John Moi, Rakhi Seth, Melonie Sriranganathan, Caroline van Durme, Irene van Echteld, Ophir Vinik and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Colchicine for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Francisca SiveraDepartment Reumatologia, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, , Elda, Spain.
Mariano Andrés
Loreto Carmona
Alison S R Kydd
John Moi
Rakhi Seth
Melonie Sriranganathan
Caroline van Durme
Irene van Echteld
Ophir Vinik
Mihir D Wechalekar
Daniel Aletaha
Claire Bombardier
Rachelle Buchbinder
Christopher J Edwards
Robert B Landewé
Johannes W Bijlsma
Jaime C Branco
Rubén Burgos-Vargas
Anca I Catrina
Dirk Elewaut
Antonio J L Ferrari
Patrick Kiely
Burkhard F Leeb
Carlomaurizio Montecucco
Ulf Müller-Ladner
Mikkel Ostergaard
Jane Zochling
Louise Falzon
Désirée M van der Heijde
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLCamilo José Cela University · ESCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCopenhagen University Hospital · DKFlinders University · AUGhent University Hospital · BEHospital de Egas Moniz · PTHospital General de Elda · ESHospital General de México · MXHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKarolinska University Hospital · SEKerckhoff Klinik · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLMedical University of Vienna · ATMenzies School of Health Research · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop evidence-based multinational recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout. Using a formal voting process, a panel of 78 international rheumatologists developed 10 key clinical questions pertinent to the diagnosis and management of gout. Each question was investigated with a systematic literature review. Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and abstracts from 2010-2011 European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology meetings were searched in each review. Relevant studies were independently reviewed by two individuals for data extraction and synthesis and risk of bias assessment. Using this evidence, rheumatologists from 14 countries (Europe, South America and Australasia) developed national recommendations. After rounds of discussion and voting, multinational recommendations were formulated. Each recommendation was graded according to the level of evidence. Agreement and potential impact on clinical practice were assessed. Combining evidence and clinical expertise, 10 recommendations were produced. One recommendation referred to the diagnosis of gout, two referred to cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, six focused on different aspects of the management of gout (including drug treatment and monitoring), and the last recommendation referred to the management of asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. The level of agreement with the recommendations ranged from 8.1 to 9.2 (mean 8.7) on a 1-10 scale, with 10 representing full agreement. Ten recommendations on the diagnosis and management of gout were established. They are evidence-based and supported by a large panel of rheumatologists from 14 countries, enhancing their utility in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBiomarkersComorbidityDrug MonitoringEvidence-Based MedicineGoutHumansInternational CooperationLife StylePractice Guidelines as TopicUricosuric AgentsBiomarkersUricosuric AgentsGoutSynovial fluidTreatment

Identifiers

PMID23868909
PMCPMC3913257
OpenAlexW2130940048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.