ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2013
[Healing by secondary intention after skin cancer surgery on the head and neck].
Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Combined flaps for defect reconstruction in the nasal region].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- [Basic principles of reconstructive dermatosurgery in the head and neck region].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defects resulting from skin cancer surgery of the head and neck can be closed with a variety of reconstruction techniques. Primary closure, local flaps and skin grafts are commonly used. Besides defect size and anatomic localization, the choice of a specific technique also depends on the dermatosurgeon's preference. Secondary intention healing often has a bad reputation and is wrongly regarded as synonymous with insufficient skills in reconstructive surgery. The indications and contraindications for secondary healing in the head and neck area are presented and related to different anatomic subunits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23868572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.