Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23868519›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2013

[Methods for endotracheal tube fixation. Results of a survey of intensive care nurses].

O Rothaug, T Müller-Wolff, A Kaltwasser, R Dubb, C Hermes

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Treatment algorithm: oral hygiene in orally intubated patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  3. [Quality assurance and quality management in intensive care].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2015
    Article
  4. [Tolerance of endotracheal tubes in patients on mechanical ventilation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

O RothaugOperative Intensivstation 0117/0118, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland, o.rothaug@gmx.de.
T Müller-Wolff
A Kaltwasser
R Dubb
C Hermes
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen · DEHelios Hospital Siegburg · DEKatharinenhospital · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are a wide variety of strategies and methods used in securing and managing the oral endotracheal tube and mouth and oral care in German clinical intensive care nursing for mechanically ventilated patients. There are no nationally recognized guidelines or recommendations on this topic. A survey among intensive care nurses identified the most widely used nursing strategies and methods. Regarding the results of the survey and international literature findings, the commonly used strategies and methods are discussed. Following these discussions, there are recommendations for improving nursing care of orally intubated patients in intensive care, including the aspects of evidence identified, currently used methods and patient needs. Also included are aspects of patient safety, potential complications and quality-orientated nursing care within a system having limited overall nursing care resources.

Indexed as

BandagesSurgical TapeAirway ExtubationAttitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareCritical Care NursingDelphi TechniqueEquipment FailureEvidence-Based NursingHealth SurveysHumansIntubation, IntratrachealOral HygienePatient PositioningQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID23868519
OpenAlexW2108828741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.