Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23868055›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2013

A prospective proteomic-based study for identifying potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Yuan Shi, Xiaxing Deng, Qian Zhan, Baiyong Shen, Xiaolong Jin, Zhecheng Zhu, Hao Chen, Hongwei Li, Chenghong Peng

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of the Key Genes and Pathways in Esophageal Carcinoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan ShiDepartment of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er RD, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Xiaxing Deng
Qian Zhan
Baiyong Shen
Xiaolong Jin
Zhecheng Zhu
Hao Chen
Hongwei Li
Chenghong Peng
Ruijin Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is becoming a common fatal hepatic tumor. Early detection of CCA is hampered by the absence of a sufficiently accurate and noninvasive diagnostic test. Proteomic analysis would be a powerful tool to identify potential biomarkers of this cancer.

aimsThis study aims to identify new protein markers that are specific for CCA using proteomic approaches and to evaluate the performance of S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) and chaperonin-containing TCR1, subunit 3 (CCTγ) as diagnostic markers for screening test of CCA.

methodsTwo-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry were used to analyze and screen biomarker candidates in the proteomes of five human CCA samples and five healthy control samples. Subsequently, two potential biomarkers, S100A9 and CCTγ, were chosen for validation and analysis by immunohistochemical methods using CCA tissue microarrays.

resultsTwenty protein spots were significantly elevated and five protein spots were downregulated in all patients (p < 0.05). The positive rate was significantly higher in patients with CCA (48 ± 35%) compared with the normal liver control group (5 ± 10%, p < 0.001), the hepatocellular carcinoma group (15 ± 20%, p < 0.001), and the cirrhosis group (12 ± 16%, p < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients with CCA were positive for CCTγ (72 ± 18%) compared with the normal liver control group (43 ± 22%, p < 0.001), the hepatocellular carcinoma group (45 ± 20%, p < 0.001), and the cirrhosis group (39 ± 25%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsCombined comparative proteomic analysis using 2-D DIGE and MALDI-TOF is an effective method for identifying differentially expressed proteins in CCA tissues. The expression of S100A9 and CCTγ showed promise as novel diagnostic markers for CCA.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticProteomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCalgranulin BCase-Control StudiesChaperonin Containing TCP-1CholangiocarcinomaDown-RegulationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLiverBiomarkers, TumorCalgranulin BCCT3 protein, humanChaperonin Containing TCP-1

Identifiers

PMID23868055
PMCPMC3753471
OpenAlexW1972645690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.