Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2013
The effects of umbilical cord milking in extremely preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- Interventions to Reduce Severe Brain Injury Risk in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Antenatal and perinatal factors influencing neonatal blood pressure: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Pooled it
- Eligibility Criteria and Representativeness of Randomized Clinical Trials That Include Infants Born Extremely Premature: A Systematic Review.The Journal of pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interventions to minimize blood loss in very preterm infants-A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Short-term efficacy of umbilical cord milking in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of red blood cell transfusion on the development of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Provision of respiratory support compared to no respiratory support before cord clamping for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2016.Singapore medical journal · 2017Guideline
- The haemodynamic effects of umbilical cord milking in term infants: a randomised controlled trial.Singapore medical journal · 2023Trial
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm infants who received cord milking at birth: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Trial
- The hematological impact of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in premature neonates: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Trial
- Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants born at 22 through 27 weeks' gestation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016Trial
- Comparison of three types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term newborns: randomized control trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- [Interpretation of 2023 American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics focused update on neonatal resuscitation guidelines].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Article
- Umbilical cord milking-benefits and risks.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDelayed cord clamping has been shown to decrease the need for transfusion in preterm neonates, but may delay resuscitation. The aim of this study was to determine whether umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping in extremely preterm deliveries reduces the need for neonatal red blood cell transfusion. STUDY
designWomen admitted to a tertiary care center and expected to deliver between 24 to 28 completed weeks of gestation were randomized to cord milking before clamping or immediate cord clamping. The primary outcome was the risk of neonatal transfusion, reported as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultOf 113 women who were enrolled and randomized, 56 were assigned to cord milking with 36 remaining eligible and completing the study and 57 were assigned to the control group with 39 remaining eligible and completing the study. Albeit not statistically significant, neonates in the cord milking group were less likely to require transfusion compared with those in the control group (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.0). Neonates whose cords were milked had higher hematocrits at birth (P=0.004) and were less likely to develop an intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.0195).
conclusionMilking the umbilical cord of a preterm neonate is an easy intervention with the potential to improve perinatal outcomes. Our results suggest that milking of the cord increases the neonate's initial hematocrit and may lessen the need for transfusion in the neonatal period. The observed reduction in the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage may have important long-term implications that warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.