Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23867173›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2014

Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.

Johanna C Wiersum-Osselton, Tanneke Marijt-van der Kreek, Anneke Brand, Ingrid Veldhuizen, Johanna G van der Bom, Wim de Kort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The effect of water temperature on orthostatic tolerance: a randomised crossover trial.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Cross-Sectional Study of Blood Donors' Psychological Characteristics over 8 Weeks.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna C Wiersum-OsseltonDonor Services Unit, Sanquin Blood Supply, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanneke Marijt-van der KreekDonor Services Unit, Sanquin Blood Supply, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke BrandSanquin-LUMC Jon J. van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ingrid VeldhuizenDepartment Donor Studies, Sanquin Blood Supply, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johanna G van der BomSanquin-LUMC Jon J. van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Leiden, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wim de KortDonor Services Unit, Sanquin Blood Supply, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department Donor Studies, Sanquin Blood Supply, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jon J van Rood Centre for Clinical Transfusion Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-time donation is among recognised risk factors for vasovagal reactions to blood donation and reactions are known to reduce donor return. We assessed associations between potential risk factors and vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in first-time whole blood donation in comparison to repeat donation and analysed the impact of complications on donor return. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a cohort study on whole blood donations in The Netherlands from 1/1/2010 to 31/12/2010 using data extracted from the blood service information system. Donation data up to 31/12/2011 were used to ascertain donor return.

resultsIn 2010 28,786 donors made first whole blood donations and there were 522,958 repeat donations. Vasovagal reactions occurred in 3.9% of first donations by males and 3.5% of first donations by females compared to in 0.2% and 0.6%, respectively, of repeat donations. Associations of vasovagal reactions with other factors including age, body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in first-time and repeat donors. Needle-related complications occurred in 0.2% of male and 0.5% of female first-time donations and in 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively, of repeat donations. Among first-time donors, the return rate within 1 year was 82% following an uncomplicated first donation, but 55% and 61% following vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications, respectively; the corresponding percentages among repeat donors were 86%, 58% and 82%. DISCUSSION: Among first-time donors, females suffered less than males from vasovagal reactions. Other risk factors had similar associations among first-time and repeat donors. Vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in both first-time and repeat donors are followed by reduced donor return.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAnthropometryBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHematomaHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPainPuncturesRetrospective StudiesHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID23867173
PMCPMC3934284
OpenAlexW1602861361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.