Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23866841›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2013

Fertility preservation in female classic galactosemia patients.

Britt van Erven, Cynthia S Gubbels, Ron J van Golde, Gerard A Dunselman, Josien G Derhaag, Guido de Wert, Joep P Geraedts, Annet M Bosch, Eileen P Treacy, Corrine K Welt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Current and Future Treatments for Classic Galactosemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sweet and sour: an update on classic galactosemia.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2017
    Review
  12. Neonatal Screening: Cost-utility Analysis for Galactosemia.Iranian journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  13. Early menopause: A hazard to a woman's health.The Indian journal of medical research · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Britt van ErvenDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Genetic Metabolic Diseases Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Cynthia S Gubbels
Ron J van Golde
Gerard A Dunselman
Josien G Derhaag
Guido de Wert
Joep P Geraedts
Annet M Bosch
Eileen P Treacy
Corrine K Welt
Gerard T Berry
M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Maastricht University · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Children’s Research Centre · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost every female classic galactosemia patient develops primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) as a diet-independent complication of the disease. This is a major concern for patients and their parents, and physicians are often asked about possible options to preserve fertility. Unfortunately, there are no recommendations on fertility preservation in this group. The unique pathophysiology of classic galactosemia with a severely reduced follicle pool at an early age requires an adjusted approach. In this article recommendations for physicians based on current knowledge concerning galactosemia and fertility preservation are made. Fertility preservation is only likely to be successful in very young prepubertal patients. In this group, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is currently the only available technique. However, this technique is not ready for clinical application, it is considered experimental and reduces the ovarian reserve. Fertility preservation at an early age also raises ethical questions that should be taken into account. In addition, spontaneous conception despite POI is well described in classic galactosemia. The uncertainty surrounding fertility preservation and the significant chance of spontaneous pregnancy warrant counseling towards conservative application of these techniques. We propose that fertility preservation should only be offered with appropriate institutional research ethics approval to classic galactosemia girls at a young prepubertal age.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationCryopreservationFemaleFertilityGalactosemiasHumansPregnancyPrimary Ovarian Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID23866841
PMCPMC3718676
OpenAlexW2167258441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.