Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23866325›Full record

ReviewNature methods2013

From the connectome to brain function.

Cornelia I Bargmann, Eve Marder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 291 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
291citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

291 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cornelia I BargmannHoward Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA. cori@rockefeller.edu
Eve Marder

Funding

Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
NEUROTRANSMITTER MODULATION OF NEURONAL CIRCUITSR01NS017813 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1985 to 2009
$3.3M
Neurotransmitter Modulation of Neuronal CircuitsR37NS017813 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 2010 to 2016
$2.6M
Temperature Compensation of Neuronal and Network FunctionR01NS081013 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
INTRINSIC PLASTICITY IN OSCILLATORY NEURAL NETWORKSR37MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1995 to 2004
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS MH46742NINDS NIH HHS NS17813NINDS NIH HHS NS81013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Historical Perspective, we ask what information is needed beyond connectivity diagrams to understand the function of nervous systems. Informed by invertebrate circuits whose connectivities are known, we highlight the importance of neuronal dynamics and neuromodulation, and the existence of parallel circuits. The vertebrate retina has these features in common with invertebrate circuits, suggesting that they are general across animals. Comparisons across these systems suggest approaches to study the functional organization of large circuits based on existing knowledge of small circuits.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAnimalsBrachyuraBrainCaenorhabditis elegansHumansNerve NetNeuronsRetinaSynapses

Identifiers

PMID23866325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.