Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23866001›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2013

Ecto- and endoparasite induce similar chemical and brain neurogenomic responses in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Cynthia M McDonnell, Cédric Alaux, Hugues Parrinello, Jean-Pierre Desvignes, Didier Crauser, Emma Durbesson, Dominique Beslay, Yves Le Conte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Inflammatory bowel disease-associatedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Synthetic Acaricides andVeterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Honey bee virus causes context-dependent changes in host social behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Interactions Between Thiamethoxam andFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia M McDonnell
Cédric Alaux
Hugues Parrinello
Jean-Pierre Desvignes
Didier Crauser
Emma Durbesson
Dominique Beslay
Yves Le Conte
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAAgroParisTech · FRDépartement Environnement et Agronomie · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExclusion from a social group is an effective way to avoid parasite transmission. This type of social removal has also been proposed as a form of collective defense, or social immunity, in eusocial insect groups. If parasitic modification of host behavior is widespread in social insects, the underlying physiological and neuronal mechanisms remain to be investigated. We studied this phenomenon in honey bees parasitized by the mite Varroa destructor or microsporidia Nosema ceranae, which make bees leave the hive precociously. We characterized the chemical, behavioral and neurogenomic changes in parasitized bees, and compared the effects of both parasites.

resultsAnalysis of cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrophotometry (GC-MS) showed changes in honey bees parasitized by either Nosema ceranae or Varroa destructor after 5 days of infestation. Levels of 10-HDA, an antiseptic important for social immunity, did not change in response to parasitism. Behavioral analysis of N. ceranae- or V. destructor- parasitized bees revealed no significant differences in their behavioral acts or social interactions with nestmates. Digital gene expression (DGE) analysis of parasitized honey bee brains demonstrated that, despite the difference in developmental stage at which the bee is parasitized, Nosema and Varroa-infested bees shared more gene changes with each other than with honey bee brain expression gene sets for forager or nurse castes.

conclusionsParasitism by Nosema or Varroa induces changes to both the CHC profiles on the surface of the bee and transcriptomic profiles in the brain, but within the social context of the hive, does not result in observable effects on her behavior or behavior towards her. While parasitized bees are reported to leave the hive as foragers, their brain transcription profiles suggest that their behavior is not driven by the same molecular pathways that induce foraging behavior.

Indexed as

MitesNosemaSocial BehaviorAnimalsBeesBrainHost-Parasite InteractionsHydrocarbonsTranscriptomeHydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID23866001
PMCPMC3725162
OpenAlexW2032384206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.