ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2014
Tissue-engineered mandibular bone reconstruction for continuity defects: a systematic approach to the literature.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Response Analysis of Scaffold Implantation in Mandibular Defects and Research on Scaffold Selection.ACS omega · 2026Article
- 3D printing titanium grid scaffold facilitates osteogenesis in mandibular segmental defects.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Testosterone Enanthate: An In Vitro Study of the Effects Triggered in MG-63 Cells.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential.Journal of dental research · 2022Article
- Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Gene- and RNAi-activated scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Current progress and future directions.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- The Regulatory Role ofMediators of inflammation · 2021Review
- Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction Using Tissue Engineering Strategies: A Systematic Review of Individual Patient Data.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2020Article
- Enhancement of BMP-2 and VEGF carried by mineralized collagen for mandibular bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2020Article
- In Vivo Bone Regeneration Induced by a Scaffold of Chitosan/Dicarboxylic Acid Seeded with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2018Article
- Electron beam melting in the fabrication of three-dimensional mesh titanium mandibular prosthesis scaffold.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Growth factors in oral and maxillofacial surgery: potentials and challenges.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2013Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant surgical advances over the last decades, segmental mandibular bone repair remains a challenge. In light of this, tissue engineering might offer a next step in the evolution of mandibular reconstruction. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present report was to (1) systematically review preclinical in vivo as well as clinical literature regarding bone tissue engineering for mandibular continuity defects, and (2) to analyze their effectiveness. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge was carried out. Only publications in English were considered, and the search was broadened to animals and humans. Furthermore, the reference lists of related review articles and publications selected for inclusion in this review were systematically screened. Results of histology data and amount of bone bridging were chosen as primary outcome variables. However, for human reports, clinical radiographic evidence was accepted for defined primary outcome variable. The biomechanical properties, scaffold degradation, and clinical wound healing were selected as co-outcome variables.
resultsThe electronic search in the databases of the National Library of Medicine and ISI Web of Knowledge resulted in the identification of 6727 and 5017 titles, respectively. Thereafter, title assessment and hand search resulted in 128 abstracts, 101 full-text articles, and 29 scientific papers reporting on animal experiments as well as 11 papers presenting human data on the subject of tissue-engineered reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects that could be included in the present review.
conclusionsIt was concluded that (1) published preclinical in vivo as well as clinical data are limited, and (2) tissue-engineered approaches demonstrate some clinical potential as an alternative to autogenous bone grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.