Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23865422›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2013

Bithiazole correctors rescue CFTR mutants by two different mechanisms.

Tip W Loo, M Claire Bartlett, David M Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular modelling and molecular dynamics of CFTR.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tip W LooDepartments of Medicine and Biochemistry, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
M Claire Bartlett
David M Clarke
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 25043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better correctors are needed to repair cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) processing mutants that cause cystic fibrosis. Determining where the correctors bind to CFTR would aid in the development of new correctors. A recent study reported that the second nucleotide-binding domain (NBD2) was involved in binding of bithiazole correctors. Here, we show that bithiazole correctors could also rescue CFTR mutants that lacked NBD2. These results suggest that bithiazoles rescue CFTR mutants by two different mechanisms.

Indexed as

MutationCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorHumansModels, MolecularMolecular StructureProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryThiazolesCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID23865422
PMCPMC3737597
OpenAlexW2163898326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.