Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23864398›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2013

Obstetrical epidural and spinal anesthesia in multiple sclerosis.

Ellen Lu, Yinshan Zhao, Leanne Dahlgren, Roanne Preston, Mia van der Kop, Anne Synnes, A Dessa Sadovnick, Anthony Traboulsee, Helen Tremlett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sugammadex for Cesarean in a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2019
    Article
  4. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Multiple Sclerosis.American journal of epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen LuDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Room S178, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Yinshan Zhao
Leanne Dahlgren
Roanne Preston
Mia van der Kop
Anne Synnes
A Dessa Sadovnick
Anthony Traboulsee
Helen Tremlett
University of British Columbia · CAKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-106607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine obstetrical epidural and spinal anesthesia use in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) and the relationship with MS clinical factors. This was a retrospective cohort study, linking clinical data from women with MS in the British Columbia (BC) MS database to obstetrical data (1998-2009) from the BC Perinatal Database Registry. We compared epidural use in 431 deliveries to women with MS and 2,959 deliveries from the general population, as well as spinal use in cesarean deliveries (128 to women with MS and 846 in the general population), considering parity and using multivariate models. We also examined the association between epidural or spinal anesthesia and MS clinical factors-disease duration and disability [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score]. Of 431 deliveries to women with MS, 116 were exposed to epidural anesthesia and of 128 cesarean deliveries, 82 were exposed to spinal anesthesia. The use of epidural anesthesia was similar in nullipara (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95 % CI = 0.63-1.18, p = 0.36), but more likely in multipara with MS (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95 % CI = 1.20-2.54, p = 0.004). Spinal anesthesia use in cesarean deliveries was comparable between the MS and general population cohorts (adjusted OR = 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.55-1.31, p = 0.45). Women who delivered 5 to <10 years after MS onset were less likely to have an epidural (adjusted OR = 0.57, 95 % CI = 0.34-0.95, p = 0.03) vs. those delivering within 5 years. EDSS was not associated with use of either type of anesthesia (adjusted p > 0.1). Contrary to previous studies, epidural anesthesia use differed between women with MS and the general population and was influenced by parity and MS disease duration; these findings warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, SpinalBritish ColumbiaCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMultiple SclerosisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsStatistics, NonparametricYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23864398
OpenAlexW2045531586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.