Observational studySocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2014
A prediction model for the incidence of civil detention for crisis patients with psychiatric illnesses; the Amsterdam study of acute psychiatry VII.
Observational study in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving patient experiences of mental health inpatient care: a randomised controlled trial.Psychological medicine · 2018Trial
- Risk factors for readmission in schizophrenia patients following involuntary admission.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Relationship Between the Duration of Hospitalization and Readmission Status in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Saudi Arabian Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Predicting involuntary hospitalization in psychiatry: A machine learning investigation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021Article
- Predicting hospitalization following psychiatric crisis care using machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- A Review of the Admission System for Mental Disorders in South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Crucial factors preceding compulsory psychiatric admission: a qualitative patient-record study.BMC psychiatry · 2017Article
- Developing a change model for peer worker interventions in mental health services: a qualitative research study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2015Article
- The role of fear in mental health service users' experiences: a qualitative exploration.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2015Article
- The Low Proportion and Associated Factors of Involuntary Admission in the Psychiatric Emergency Service in Taiwan.PloS one · 2015Article
- Psychiatric advance directives, a possible way to overcome coercion and promote empowerment.Frontiers in public health · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGiven raised numbers of civil detentions in the Netherlands and other European countries, it is important to assess the patient risk profile with respect to the incidence of those far-reaching treatment decisions. The aim of the ASAP study is to develop a comprehensive prediction model that considers all possible patient-related predictors known from earlier research.
methodsWe took a random sample of 252 from the 2,682 patients coming into contact with two psychiatric emergency teams in Amsterdam between September 2004 and September 2006. We recorded socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, aspects of social support and psychiatric history. We interviewed the patients using the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (Verona-EU) and the Birchwood Insight Scale. During a two-year follow-up period we noted their use of mental health care facilities.
resultsStepwise logistic regression analyses with resulted in a final prediction model (P ≤ 0.001) including preceding involuntary admission (OR 9.4, 95% CI 3.6-24.7, P ≤ 0.001), domestic situation alone (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.9-11.0, P = 0.001) and VSSS score satisfactory (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.8, P = 0.030) as predictors of civil detention during 2 years of follow-up.
conclusionWith the presented prediction model it will be possible to identify patients at a high risk of civil detention: patients with a history of previous involuntary admissions who live alone and are not satisfied with the mental health care they got before. This suggests the possibility that timely preventive measures can be taken comprising the adjustment or intensification of the treatment plan for this specific group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23863912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.