Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23863808›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Fast GCaMPs for improved tracking of neuronal activity.

Xiaonan R Sun, Aleksandra Badura, Diego A Pacheco, Laura A Lynch, Eve R Schneider, Matthew P Taylor, Ian B Hogue, Lynn W Enquist, Mala Murthy, Samuel S-H Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Precise calcium-to-spike inference using biophysical generative models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exploring CaeNeuro · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Structural and Functional Organization of Visual Responses in the Inferior Olive of Larval Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaonan R Sun *Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Aleksandra Badura *Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Diego A PachecoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Laura A LynchDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Eve R SchneiderDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Matthew P TaylorDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Ian B HogueDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Lynn W EnquistDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Mala MurthyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Samuel S-H WangDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.

Funding

ResourceP40OD010996 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2024
$11.0M
Imaging adaptive cerebellar processing at cellular resolution in awake miceR01NS045193 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SAMUEL SHENG-HUNG · 2003 to 2024
$7.5M
CENTER FOR NEUROANATOMY WITH NEUROTROPIC VIRUSES: COMPARATIVE MEDICINEP40RR018604 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2004 to 2011
$6.5M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF HERPESVIRUS TROPISM AND VIRULENCER01NS033506 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ENQUIST, LYNN W. · 1995 to 2016
$3.7M
Neuronal Spread of Herpesvirus InfectionR01NS060699 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ENQUIST, LYNN W. · 2008 to 2017
$3.6M
Viral Brainbow: tracing brain circuits with connection order specificityRC1NS068414 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CARD, JOHN PATRICK, ENQUIST, LYNN W. · 2009 to 2010
$993k
NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR018604NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR18604NIH HHS P40 OD010996NINDS NIH HHS NS060699NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033506NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045193NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060699NINDS NIH HHS RC1 NS068414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of genetically encodable calcium indicator proteins to monitor neuronal activity is hampered by slow response times and a narrow Ca(2+)-sensitive range. Here we identify three performance-limiting features of GCaMP3, a popular genetically encodable calcium indicator protein. First, we find that affinity is regulated by the calmodulin domain's Ca(2+)-chelating residues. Second, we find that off-responses to Ca(2+) are rate-limited by dissociation of the RS20 domain from calmodulin's hydrophobic pocket. Third, we find that on-responses are limited by fast binding to the N-lobe at high Ca(2+) and by slow binding to the C-lobe at lower Ca(2+). We develop Fast-GCaMPs, which have up to 20-fold accelerated off-responses and show that they have a 200-fold range of K(D), allowing coexpression of multiple variants to span an expanded range of Ca(2+) concentrations. Finally, we show that Fast-GCaMPs track natural song in Drosophila auditory neurons and generate rapid responses in mammalian neurons, supporting the utility of our approach.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBinding SitesCalciumCalmodulinDrosophila melanogasterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKineticsMiceModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNeuronsProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCalciumCalmodulinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23863808
PMCPMC3824390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.