The ambiguity of personhood.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Natural Products in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Great Promise but an Ethical Challenge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
   Review
2. The ecology of patient and caregiver participation in consultations involving advanced cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2018
   Article
3. "Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.Patient education and counseling · 2014
   Observational
4. The Ethics of Ambiguity: Rethinking the Role and Importance of Uncertainty in Medical Education and Practice.Academic pathology
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care.2013
• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as