Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23862292›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2013

Medical mistrust influences black women's level of engagement in BRCA 1/2 genetic counseling and testing.

Vanessa B Sheppard, Darren Mays, Thomas LaVeist, Kenneth P Tercyak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03511690 (Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Blacks and Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511690 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Blacks and Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled95ConditionsHereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerArmsBRCA-Gist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of theCirculation · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa B SheppardCancer Control Program, Lombardi Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20007, USA. vls3@georgetown.edu
Darren Mays
Thomas LaVeist
Kenneth P Tercyak
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evidence supports the value of BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing for managing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk; however, BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing are underutilized among black women, and reasons for low use remain elusive. We examined the potential influence of sociocultural factors (medical mistrust, concerns about genetic discrimination) on genetic counseling and testing engagement in a sample of 100 black women at increased risk for carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation. Eligible participants fell into 1 of 3 groups: (1) healthy women with at least 1 first-degree relative affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer, (2) women diagnosed with breast cancer at age less than or equal to 50 years; and (3) women diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer at age greater than or equal to 50 years with either 1 first-degree relative or 2 second-degree relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Participants were recruited from clinical anid community settings and completed a semistructured interview. Study variable relationships were examined using bivariate tests and multivariate regression analysis. As expected, genetic counseling and testing engagement among this sample was low (28%). After accounting for;sociodemographic factors and self-efficacy (beta=0.37, p<.001), women with higher medical mistrust had lower genetic counseling and testing engagement (beta=-0.26, p<.01). Community-level and individual interventions are needed to improve utilization of genetic counseling and testing among underserved women. Along with trust building between patients and providers, strategies should enhance women's personal confidence. The impact of medical mistrust on the realization of the benefits of personalized medicine in minority populations should be further examined in future studies.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsEthics, ProfessionalFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsRisk FactorsBRCA1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID23862292
PMCPMC3721431
OpenAlexW149929402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.