ArticlePloS one2013
Point charges optimally placed to represent the multipole expansion of charge distributions.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of glycans and hinge on dynamics in the IgG1 Fc.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2024Article
- New experimental evidence for pervasive dynamics in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Fast Polarizable Water Model for Atomistic Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Using All-Atom Potentials to Refine RNA Structure Predictions of SARS-CoV-2 Stem Loops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Multiscale Coarse-Grained Approach to Investigate Self-Association of Antibodies.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules.Annual review of biophysics · 2019Review
- Prediction of experimental properties of COJournal of molecular modeling · 2019Article
- Why Computed Protein Folding Landscapes Are Sensitive to the Water Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Article
- High-Temperature Dynamic Behavior in Bulk Liquid Water: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study using the OPC and TIP4P-Ew Potentials.Frontiers of physics · 2018Article
- Article
- Ionic Solution: What Goes Right and Wrong with Continuum Solvation Modeling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2017Article
- Physics-based all-atom modeling of RNA energetics and structure.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2017Review
- Implicit Solvent Model for Million-Atom Atomistic Simulations: Insights into the Organization of 30-nm Chromatin Fiber.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2016Article
- Accuracy limit of rigid 3-point water models.The Journal of chemical physics · 2016Article
- Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015Article
- Building Water Models: A Different Approach.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose an approach for approximating electrostatic charge distributions with a small number of point charges to optimally represent the original charge distribution. By construction, the proposed optimal point charge approximation (OPCA) retains many of the useful properties of point multipole expansion, including the same far-field asymptotic behavior of the approximate potential. A general framework for numerically computing OPCA, for any given number of approximating charges, is described. We then derive a 2-charge practical point charge approximation, PPCA, which approximates the 2-charge OPCA via closed form analytical expressions, and test the PPCA on a set of charge distributions relevant to biomolecular modeling. We measure the accuracy of the new approximations as the RMS error in the electrostatic potential relative to that produced by the original charge distribution, at a distance 2x the extent of the charge distribution--the mid-field. The error for the 2-charge PPCA is found to be on average 23% smaller than that of optimally placed point dipole approximation, and comparable to that of the point quadrupole approximation. The standard deviation in RMS error for the 2-charge PPCA is 53% lower than that of the optimal point dipole approximation, and comparable to that of the point quadrupole approximation. We also calculate the 3-charge OPCA for representing the gas phase quantum mechanical charge distribution of a water molecule. The electrostatic potential calculated by the 3-charge OPCA for water, in the mid-field (2.8 Å from the oxygen atom), is on average 33.3% more accurate than the potential due to the point multipole expansion up to the octupole order. Compared to a 3 point charge approximation in which the charges are placed on the atom centers, the 3-charge OPCA is seven times more accurate, by RMS error. The maximum error at the oxygen-Na distance (2.23 Å) is half that of the point multipole expansion up to the octupole order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.