Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23861470›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2013

Co-polysomy of chromosome 1q and 19p predicts worse prognosis in 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglial tumors: FISH analysis of 148 consecutive cases.

Xiaohui Ren, Haihui Jiang, Xiangli Cui, Yong Cui, Jun Ma, Zhongli Jiang, Dali Sui, Song Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaohui RenNeurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Haihui Jiang
Xiangli Cui
Yong Cui
Jun Ma
Zhongli Jiang
Dali Sui
Song Lin
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of co-polsomy of chromosome 1q and 19p in 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglial tumors (ODGs).

methodsIn a series of 148 ODGs with 1p/19q deletion, co-polysomy of 1q and 19p was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Log-rank analysis and Cox regression methods were used to compare Kaplan-Meier plots and identify factors associated with worse prognosis.

resultsThere were 104 (70.3%) low-grade ODGs and 44 (29.7%) high-grade ODGs. Co-polysomy was independently associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival in 1p/19q codeleted ODGs, irrespective of tumor grades. The odds ratio of without and with co-polysomy was 0.263 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.089-0.771; P = .015) for progression-free survival and 0.213 (95% CI, 0.060-0.756; P = .017) for overall survival. Subgroup analysis confirmed this trend in both low-grade and high-grade ODGs, although the P value for high-grade ODGs was marginally significant.

conclusionsCo-polysomy of 1q and 19p could be used as a marker to independently predict worse prognoses and guide individual therapy in 1p/19q codeleted ODGs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersBrain NeoplasmsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19FemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedOligodendrogliomaPrognosisYoung AdultBiomarkers1p/19q co-deletionco-polysomyoligodendroglial tumorsprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID23861470
PMCPMC3748924
OpenAlexW2096136296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.