ArticleCancer2013
Are physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer appropriate? A population-based study.
Article in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04533555 (Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Provider discussion of genetic counseling among high-risk Spanish-preferring Latina breast cancer survivors.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Genetic testing and surgical treatment after breast cancer diagnosis: Results from a national online cohort.Journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Persistent Underutilization of BRCA1/2 Testing Suggest the Need for New Approaches to Genetic Testing Delivery.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019Article
- Trends in BRCA Test Utilization in an Integrated Health System, 2005-2015.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019Article
- Article
- Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Efficacy versus effectiveness of clinical genetic testing criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary mutations in incident breast cancer.Familial cancer · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Germline Analysis from Tumor-Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016Article
- Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2015Article
- The role of testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in cancer prevention.JAMA internal medicine · 2014Article
- Attitudes and knowledge of medical practitioners to hereditary cancer clinics and cancer genetic testing.Familial cancer · 2014Article
- Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Recruitment of a Population-Based Sample of Young Black Women with Breast Cancer through a State Cancer Registry.The breast journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo the best of the authors' knowledge, few population-based studies to date have examined the use of BRCA1/2 testing or patterns of physician recommendations for genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rates and predictors of physician recommendation for BRCA1/2 testing among patients with breast cancer.
methodsWomen aged 18 years to 64 years who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2007 were identified from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry and mailed a survey regarding their family history of cancer, physician treatment recommendations, and BRCA1/2 testing. Of the 4009 women who were sent surveys, 2258 responded (56%). Based on age at diagnosis and family history, women were categorized as being at high, moderate, or low risk of BRCA1/2 mutations.
resultsNearly 25% of the participants were classified as being at high risk of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation based on their age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing were found to be strongly associated with risk of carrying a mutation, with 53% of high-risk women reporting a testing recommendation compared with 9% of low-risk women. In addition, physician recommendations were strongly correlated with the use of testing in all risk groups. Among high-risk women, the lack of a recommendation for BRCA1/2 testing was more common among older, low-income, and employed women.
conclusionsAlthough BRCA1/2 testing recommendations appear to be appropriately correlated with mutation risk, a significant percentage of patients with breast cancer who meet criteria for BRCA1/2 testing may not receive a recommendation for such testing from their health care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.