Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23861162›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2013

[Resistance to medicinal tumor therapy. Current status].

H Lage, U Kellner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H LageInstitut für Pathologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany. hermann.lage@charite.de
U Kellner
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past multiple mechanisms could be identified that are involved in anticancer drug resistance; however, diagnostic assays for prediction of therapy response to classical cytostatic drugs did not enter routine clinical diagnostics. Only when new targeted drugs, e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors or therapeutic antibodies, were introduced in oncology were diagnostics for prediction of therapy response routinely preformed. First and foremost this was the result of the development of highly standardized techniques, i.e. exact mutation analysis in functional relevant codons of genes encoding signal proteins of cancer-related signal transduction pathways targeted by the new drugs. Due to increasing costs of health systems, in the future predictive diagnostics will probably become more and more important. Therefore, it will be necessary to develop improved diagnostic assays for prediction of individual therapy response.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCodonDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, MultipleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesSignal TransductionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCodonProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23861162
OpenAlexW2888690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.