Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23861154›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2013

Reirradiation plus EGFR inhibition in locally recurrent and unresectable head and neck cancer: final results from a single institution.

D Milanović, B Jeremić, A L Grosu, G Rücker, M Henke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Re-irradiation with cetuximab or cisplatin-based chemotherapy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Article
  3. Lipiodol injections for optimization of target volume delineation in a patient with a second tumor of the oropharynx: A case report.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Article
  4. When is re-irradiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma not indicated?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D MilanovićDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany, dusan.milanovic@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
B Jeremić
A L Grosu
G Rücker
M Henke
University Medical Center Freiburg · DETygerberg Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor some patients with recurrent, unresectable, and previously irradiated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), reirradiation (re-RT) may be a curative option. Chemotherapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition is established as palliative management. This retrospective single-institutional study investigates feasibility, toxicity, and outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) combined with EGFR blockade for these patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween June 2008 and June 2012, 23 patients with inoperable and previously irradiated HNSCC were reirradiated. Concomitant EGFR blockade (cetuximab) was given initially at 400 mg/m2 two days prior to re-RT and weekly (250 mg/m2) thereafter. PET/CT imaging was fused with planning CT in 8 patients.

resultsOne patient died of anaphylactic shock during the first cetuximab administration; two discontinued treatment on their own request. In all, 20 patients completed re-RT (50.4-66.6 Gy) and received cetuximab as prescribed. Grade 3 acute side effects were documented for dermatitis (35%), dysphagia (30%), acneiform rash (30%), and mucositis (15%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 34.8% Median overall and progression-free survival times were 9 and 4.3 months, respectively. A multivariable analysis using the Cox regression model showed significant positive impact of acneiform rash (hazard ratio [HR] 0.1531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0383-0.6111), while a period from first radiation to re-RT longer than 120 months negatively (HR 0.1633, 95% CI 0.0305-0.8734) influenced patient survival.

conclusionre-RT with concurrent cetuximab was feasible. Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with fluorouracil and cetuximab, this therapeutic approach did not demonstrate survival benefit. Prolonged intervals from first treatment to re-RT seem to be unfavorable.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabChemoradiotherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationErbB ReceptorsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID23861154
OpenAlexW1582081261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.