Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23861091›Full record

ArticleCancer2013

Trends in the occurrence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in San Francisco: 2000-2009.

Edgar P Simard, Meg Watson, Mona Saraiya, Christina A Clarke, Joel M Palefsky, Ahmedin Jemal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016
    Review
  11. Anal Cancer Incidence in the United States, 1977-2011: Distinct Patterns by Histology and Behavior.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The burden of HPV-associated anogenital cancers.Current oncology reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Edgar P SimardSurveillance Research Program, Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Meg Watson
Mona Saraiya
Christina A Clarke
Joel M Palefsky
Ahmedin Jemal
American Cancer Society · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough screening of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals for anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN; a precursor of anal cancer) has been practiced in San Francisco among HIV health care providers since the early 1990s, to the authors' knowledge no study to date has focused on evaluating recent AIN trends.

methodsCases of high-grade AIN 3 and invasive anal cancer from 2000 to 2009 were obtained from the San Francisco/Oakland Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based cancer registry. Age-standardized rates of AIN 3 and anal cancer were calculated overall and by demographic characteristics (sex, race, and age group). Log-linear regression calculated annual percent change in rates during 2000 to 2009, and rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), evaluated differences in rates during 2000 through 2004 and 2005 through 2009.

resultsDuring 2000 through 2009, the majority of AIN 3 cases occurred among men (1152 of 1320 men; 87.3%). Rates of AIN 3 during the corresponding period increased by 11.48% per year (P < .05) among men and were stable among women. Comparing rates among men during 2000 to 2004 with those during 2005 to 2009, the largest increases were noted among those aged 50 years to 64 years (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.93-3.17) and among black individuals (RR, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.14-5.85). During the same period, anal cancer rates were stable among men and women.

conclusionsRates of AIN 3 increased in San Francisco during 2000 through 2009, in conjunction with an anal cytology screening program for high-risk groups, whereas rates of invasive anal cancer were unchanged. Continued surveillance is necessary to evaluate the impact of screening and human papillomavirus vaccination on the prevention of human papillomavirus-related AIN and anal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRisk FactorsSan FranciscoYoung Adultanal canceranal intraepithelial neoplasiaincidencescreening

Identifiers

PMID23861091
PMCPMC4535426
OpenAlexW1530811954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.