Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23860880›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2014

The pharmacology of novel oral anticoagulants.

Tracy A DeWald, Richard C Becker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transforming Treatment: The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Oral Drug Absorption.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bariatric Surgery can Lower the Efficacy of DOACs.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence Gaps in the Era of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tracy A DeWaldDivisions of Clinical Pharmacology (TAD) and Cardiovascular Medicine (RCB) Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute (RCB), Durham, NC, USA, dewal001@mc.duke.edu.
Richard C Becker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke is an important aspect of the management of atrial fibrillation. Novel anticoagulants including oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran have emerged as important therapeutic treatment options for prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents offer practical advantages over traditional vitamin K antagonists, however an understanding of their individual pharmacokinetic and other agent-specific differences is essential for identifying appropriate candidates for therapy, and for selecting the appropriate agent that will be effective and safe. Here, we review the pharmacokinetic process of oral medication use, summarize the newer anticoagulants, their pharmacology, individual pharmacokinetic features, and explore possible explanations for the differences in bleeding outcomes observed in the clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsAdministration, OralClinical Trials as TopicHemorrhageHumansStrokeVitamin KAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsVitamin K

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.