Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23860823›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2013

Safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in different age-groups: a1chieve sub-analysis.

Mohammad Ebrahim Khamseh, Jihad Haddad, Wenying Yang, Alexey Zilov, Ole Molskov Bech, Mohammad Imtiaz Hasan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00869908 (The Effect of NovoMix® 30, Levemir® or NovoRapid®), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00869908 completednot on this map

The Effect of NovoMix® 30, Levemir® or NovoRapid® (Alone or in Combination) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Previously Treated With Other Anti-diabetic Medication. A 24-week, International, Prospective, Multi-centre, Open-labelled, Non-interventional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2008 to 2011Enrolled66,726ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsinsulin aspart, insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohammad Ebrahim KhamsehEndocrine Research Centre (Firouzgar), Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jihad Haddad
Wenying Yang
Alexey Zilov
Ole Molskov Bech
Mohammad Imtiaz Hasan
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNSechenov University · RUTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRThe Farah Hospital · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective management of type 2 diabetes requires sustained glycemic control over many years, which can be particularly challenging for elderly people. This sub-analysis of the A1chieve study evaluated the clinical safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in 3 age-groups (≤40, >40-65, and >65 years) of previously insulin-experienced and insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes.

methodsA1chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes who had been receiving anti-diabetes medication before starting, or switching to, therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart (alone or in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (±oral glucose-lowering drugs) in different age-groups.

resultsData on 40,122 participants were included. In all age-groups, the proportion of participants experiencing any hypoglycemia, major hypoglycemia or nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly reduced from baseline, except for the following in insulin-naïve patients: a significant increase in any hypoglycemia in patients aged >65 years; no change in any hypoglycemia, major hypoglycemia, and nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients aged >40-65, ≤40, and >65 years, respectively. Significant improvements at 24 weeks vs. baseline were observed in insulin-experienced and insulin-naïve participants for: glycated hemoglobin (change from baseline ranged from -1.8% to -2.4%); fasting plasma glucose (from -3.0 to -4.3 mmol/l); post-breakfast post-prandial plasma glucose (from -4.1 to -6.5 mmol/l); and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Sixteen serious adverse drug reactions were reported.

conclusionAfter 24-week treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30, all age-groups of insulin-experienced and insulin-naïve patients experienced significantly improved glycemic control and HRQoL; incidence of hypoglycemia was generally reduced. The tolerability and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 may benefit all age-groups.

Identifiers

PMID23860823
PMCPMC3889316
OpenAlexW2076408518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.