ArticlePlant molecular biology2013
Functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules of STMADS11 superclade MADS-box genes.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomics Analysis Reveals a Putative Role for Hormone Signaling and MADS-Box Genes in Mature Chestnut Shoots Rooting Recalcitrance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- MADS goes genomic in conifers: towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants.Annals of botany · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolution of phenotypic morphologies is closely associated with modular organization of cis-regulatory elements underlying expression divergence. The MADS-box gene family is the subject of extensive studies that try to unscramble the structural complexity of flowering plants. This study is envisaged to explore the potential of CRMs in highly constrained non-coding elements of STMADS11superclade MADS-box genes in expression divergence. Phylogenetic reconstruction differentiated the STMADS11 genes into SVP-like, ZMM19-like, MPF1-like and MPF2-like clades. Differential gene expression in vegetative and floral organs was evident within the clades as well as at inter-clade level. The genomic DNA search for clusters of short motifs and sequence conservation of the -2 kb promoter region of particularly, MPF2-like clade permitted to establish three well defined CRMs where transcription factors bind, being CRM1 the activator, CRM2 the repressor, and CRM3 the enhancer element. Similar clusters were also mapped in the large 1st introns in the coding region. Within these CRMs many transcription factor-binding sites, particularly the hotspots for MADS-domain TF binding elements--CArG-boxes, directing sepal specific expression in Arabidopsis--were accrued in the CRM1 of MPF2-like promoters. Site-directed mutagenesis and motif swapping through reporter assays allude towards their implication as functionally active elements. In terms of directional evolution of MPF2-like promoters, CRMs are significantly more conserved than flanking regions, hence, bearing the signatures for purifying selection. Thus, CRMs are the pervasive feature of STMADS11 genes and mutations and/or appearance of new transcription factor binding sites and position of the CRMs are responsible for the divergence in expression patterns in this clade. These results have implications in understanding functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.