ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2013
Maintenance therapy with pegaptanib sodium for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an exploratory study in Japanese patients (LEVEL-J study).
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 20th Anniversary of Pegaptanib (MacugenTM), the First Approved Aptamer Medicine: History, Recent Advances and Future Prospects of Aptamers in Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The importance of pegaptanib sodium treatment for patients with vascular active vitreoretinopathy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Fit for the Eye: Aptamers in Ocular Disorders.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2016Review
- Long-term outcome of intravitreal pegaptanib sodium as maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2015Article
- Multimodal evaluation of macular function in age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the efficacy and safety of pegaptanib sodium as maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with neovascular, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) after induction therapy (LEVEL-J study).
methodsA multi-center, prospective study was conducted at 21 medical institutions between 2009 and 2011. Of Japanese neovascular AMD patients with choroidal neovascularization who showed improvement in visual acuity (VA) with induction therapy, those who were scheduled for intravitreal injections of pegaptanib as maintenance therapy were recruited. LogMAR VA was assessed. Booster treatment (unscheduled treatment with other agents) was allowed during the study period if symptoms were judged to have worsened. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and intraocular pressure (IOP).
resultsOf 75 patients included in the analysis, 80 % completed the 54-week study period. Their mean age was 74.7 ± 6.9 years, and 54 patients (72.0 %) were men. The mean number of pegaptanib injections was 5.7 ± 2.6. Booster treatment was not required in 40 eyes (53.3 %). Mean logMAR VA was 0.61 ± 0.31 before induction therapy, 0.26 ± 0.24 before maintenance therapy, and 0.29 ± 0.28 at 54 weeks. No notable change in VA was observed during maintenance therapy. Adverse events were reported in 4 patients (5.3 %), including increased intraocular pressure, cancer, gallstones and recurrence of breast cancer, but mean IOP remained stable during maintenance therapy.
conclusionsThe results of this exploratory study suggest that maintenance therapy with pegaptanib is potentially an effective and well-tolerated option in Japanese patients with neovascular AMD in whom induction therapy has been successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.