Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23860579›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2013

[Non-unions. From diagnosis to healing].

E Steinhausen, M Glombitza, H-J Böhm, P-M Hax, D Rixen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Non-unions of the upper extremities].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of infected tibial nonunion].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. [Reconstruction of posttraumatic deformities and defects].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  5. [Infected nonunion: diagnostic and therapeutic work-up].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. High prevalence of bacteria in clinically aseptic non-unions of the tibia and the femur in tissue biopsies.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Complication management for failed bone fracture healing: pseudarthrosis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E SteinhausenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Zentrum für Pseudarthrosen, BG-Unfallklinik Duisburg, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Deutschland. Eva.Steinhausen@bgu-duisburg.de
M Glombitza
H-J Böhm
P-M Hax
D Rixen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-unions are a relevant medical and socio-economic problem. Hyper-, oligo- and atrophic non-unions as well as septic and aseptic non-unions are differentiated. Correct classification is essential for the selected therapy. The "diamond concept" describes five pillars, on which bone healing is based and that have to be considered in the treatment of non-unions: osteogenic cells (mesenchymal stem cells), osteoinduction (growth factors), osteoconduction (scaffolds), mechanical stability, and vascularization. Factors that predispose to non-union also influence fracture healing. The gold standard of therapy are still resection of the non-union, decortication and autologous bone grafting. No advantage could be proven for any of the numerous procedures in monotherapy. But the combination of various procedures - polytherapy - seems to be promising. The aim is to optimize these concepts.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCombined Modality TherapyFracture HealingHumansOsteotomyPseudarthrosisBone Substitutes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.