Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23860204›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2013

Adding epoetin alfa to intense dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: randomized clinical trial.

Volker Moebus, Christian Jackisch, Andreas Schneeweiss, Jens Huober, Hans-Joachim Lueck, Andreas du Bois, Christoph Thomssen, Christian Kurbacher, Walther Kuhn, Ulrike Nitz and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Supportive Treatments for Patients with Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents and clinical outcomes in metastatic breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a closed debate?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on osmotic fragility of red blood cells and plasma levels of malondialdehyde in patients with breast cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Volker MoebusDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany. volker.moebus@klinikumfrankfurt.de
Christian Jackisch
Andreas Schneeweiss
Jens Huober
Hans-Joachim Lueck
Andreas du Bois
Christoph Thomssen
Christian Kurbacher
Walther Kuhn
Ulrike Nitz
Ingo B Runnebaum
Axel Hinke
Rolf Kreienberg
Michael Untch
AGO Breast Study Group
International Breast Cancer Study Group · CHKlinikum Frankfurt Höchst · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe AGO-ETC trial compared 5-year relapse-free survival of intense dose-dense (IDD) sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin (E), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) (IDD-ETC) every 2 weeks vs conventional scheduled epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC→T) (every 3 weeks) as adjuvant treatment in high-risk breast cancer patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epoetin alfa in a second randomization of the intense dose-dense arm.

methodsOne thousand two hundred eighty-four patients were enrolled; 658 patients were randomly assigned to the IDD-ETC treatment group. Within the IDD-ETC group, 324 patients were further randomly assigned to the epoetin alfa group, and 319 were randomly assigned to the non-erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) control group. Primary efficacy endpoints included change in hemoglobin level from baseline to Cycle 9 and the percentage of subjects requiring red blood cell transfusion. Relapse-free survival, overall survival, and intramammary relapse were secondary endpoints estimated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Except for the primary hypothesis, all statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsEpoetin alfa avoided the decrease in hemoglobin level (no decrease in the epoetin alfa group vs -2.20g/dL change for the control group; P < .001) and statistically significantly reduced the percentage of subjects requiring red blood cell transfusion (12.8% vs 28.1%; P < .0001). The incidence of thrombotic events was 7% in the epoetin alfa arm vs 3% in the control arm. After a median follow-up of 62 months, epoetin alfa treatment did not affect overall survival, relapse-free survival, or intramammary relapse.

conclusionsEpoetin alfa resulted in improved hemoglobin levels and decreased transfusions without an impact on relapse-free or overall survival. However, epoetin alfa had an adverse effect, resulting in increased thrombosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkersBlood TransfusionBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleEpirubicinEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematinicsBiomarkersCyclophosphamideEpirubicinEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinHematinicsHemoglobinsPaclitaxelRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23860204
PMCPMC3714019
OpenAlexW3147151963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.