Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23860047›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014

An unusual clinical severity of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome caused by unmasked recessive mutation of CLN3.

Céline Pebrel-Richard, Anne Debost-Legrand, Eléonore Eymard-Pierre, Victoria Greze, Stéphan Kemeny, Mathilde Gay-Bellile, Laetitia Gouas, Andreï Tchirkov, Philippe Vago, Carole Goumy and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Autonomic failure associated with 16p11.2 duplication in two siblings.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Céline Pebrel-Richard1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anne Debost-LegrandGénétique Médicale, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Eléonore Eymard-Pierre1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Victoria GrezeGénétique Médicale, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Stéphan Kemeny1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mathilde Gay-Bellile1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laetitia Gouas1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Andreï Tchirkov1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe Vago1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Carole Goumy1] Cytogénétique Médicale, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France [2] ERTICa, EA 4677, Univ Clermont1, UFR Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christine FrancannetGénétique Médicale, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Génétique Médicale & Génomique Fonctionelle · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the introduction of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) techniques in the diagnostic setting of patients with developmental delay and congenital malformations, many new microdeletion syndromes have been recognized. One of these recently recognized microdeletion syndromes is the 16p11.2 deletion syndrome, associated with variable clinical outcomes including developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, and obesity, but also apparently normal phenotype. We report on a 16-year-old patient with developmental delay, exhibiting retinis pigmentosa with progressive visual failure from the age of 9 years, ataxia, and peripheral neuropathy. Chromosomal microarray analysis identified a 1.7-Mb 16p11.2 deletion encompassing the 593-kb common deletion (∼29.5 to ∼30.1 Mb; Hg18) and the 220-kb distal deletion (∼28.74 to ∼28.95 Mb; Hg18) that partially included the CLN3 gene. As the patient's clinical findings were different from usual 16p11.2 microdeletion phenotypes and showed some features reminiscent of juvenile neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (JNCL, Batten disease, OMIM 204200), we suspected and confirmed a mutation of the remaining CLN3 allele. This case further illustrates that unmasking of hemizygous recessive mutations by chromosomal deletion represents one explanation for the phenotypic variability observed in chromosomal deletion disorders.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAutistic DisorderChromosome DeletionChromosome DisordersChromosomes, Human, Pair 16HemizygoteHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMolecular ChaperonesSeverity of Illness IndexCLN3 protein, humanMembrane GlycoproteinsMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID23860047
PMCPMC3925269
OpenAlexW2076485743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.