Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23859638›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2014

Retention of participants in medication-assisted programs in low- and middle-income countries: an international systematic review.

Jonathan Feelemyer, Don Des Jarlais, Kamyar Arasteh, Abu S Abdul-Quader, Holly Hagan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Methadone use for acute opioid withdrawal in Tshwane shelters during the COVID-19 lockdown.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Harm reduction in practice - The Community Oriented Substance Use Programme in Tshwane.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan FeelemyerThe Baron Edmond de Rothschild Chemical Dependency Institute, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Don Des Jarlais
Kamyar Arasteh
Abu S Abdul-Quader
Holly Hagan

Funding

Multiple HIV Prevention Packages for IDUs in EstoniaR01AI083035 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CTR (NEW YORK) · PI DES JARLAIS, DON C · 2009 to 2012
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMedication-assisted treatment (MAT) is a key component in overdose prevention, reducing illicit opiate use and risk of blood-borne virus infection. By retaining participants in MAT programs for longer periods of time, more noticeable and permanent changes in drug use, risk behavior and quality of life can be achieved. Many studies have documented retention in MAT programs in high-income countries, using a 50% average 12-month follow-up retention rate as a marker for a successful MAT program. This study contributes to a systematic understanding of how successful programs have been in retaining participants in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) over time.

methodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search to identify MAT program studies that documented changes in retention over time for participants in buprenorphine and methadone programs in LMIC. Retention was measured for participants by length of follow-up, type of MAT and treatment dosage.

resultsThere were 58 MAT program studies, with 27 047 participants eligible for inclusion in the review. Overall average retention after 12 months was 54.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 46.2, 63.7%]. Overall average retention was moderately good for both buprenorphine (48.3%, 95% CI = 22.1, 74.6%) and methadone (56.6%, 95% CI = 45.9%, 67.3%) after 12 months of treatment. Among programs using methadone there was no statistically significant difference in average retention by dosage level, and the 10 highest and lowest dosage programs obtained similar average retention levels after 12 months.

conclusionMedication-assisted treatment programs in low- and middle-income countries achieve an average 50% retention rate after 12 months, with wide variation across programs but little difference between those using buprenorphine versus methadone.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesMedication AdherenceAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHumansMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphinedeveloping countrieslow‐ and middle‐income countriesmethadoneopiate abuseopiate substitution programs

Identifiers

PMID23859638
PMCPMC5312702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.